§Legal Chronicle

Research carefully. Write clearly. Cite everything.

We are looking for students who can research carefully, write clearly and back their arguments with primary sources — and who want to hold their own work to that standard, not just meet ours.

Open to student contributors · Every piece is edited before it runs

01 — Why contribute

Legal Chronicle is small on purpose, so every published piece carries real editorial weight.

Nothing here is buried in a feed of hundreds. Contributing means writing work meant to last in an archive, under your own byline, reviewed to a standard that will make it better before it is published.

03 — Expectations
  1. 01

    Accuracy — every legal claim should be checkable against a source.

  2. 02

    Primary sources — statutes and judgments over secondhand summaries.

  3. 03

    Citations — readers should be able to trace your claims themselves.

  4. 04

    Original work — written for Legal Chronicle, not recycled elsewhere.

  5. 05

    Clear writing — plain language over unnecessary complexity.

  6. 06

    Responsible use of AI — a research or drafting aid, never a source of fact.

04 — Editorial process

Eight steps, no shortcuts

  1. 01Idea
  2. 02Scope
  3. 03Research
  4. 04Outline
  5. 05Draft
  6. 06Verify
  7. 07Editorial Review
  8. 08Publish
05 — Ready to pitch

Send the question you want to answer.

Tell us why it matters and which sources you expect to use. We will come back to you about scope before you start drafting.